methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, TMP-SMX, methicillin resistance Objective. To review available data regarding the efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for the treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Data Sources. A MEDLINE search was performed (January 1966–December 2003) using the search terms Staphylococcus aureus, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, co-trimoxazole, and methicillin resistance. Abstracts from infectious diseases meetings also were reviewed. Data Synthesis. The reported rate of TMP-SMX resistance in S. aureus is highly variable. From a mechanistic standpoint, TMP-SMX resistance among MRSA appears to be distinct from multidrug resistance, although some anecdotal reports suggest otherwise. Clonal outbreaks of MRSA resistant to TMP-SMX have been described; of these, the Brazilian clone has more often been resistant to TMP-SMX than the Iberian clone. Rates of TMP-SMX resistance are particularly high in institutions serving large numbers of patients infected by the human immunodeficiency virus, due to increased exposure for Pneumocystis prophylaxis. Limited studies and case reports have found TMP-SMX useful against infections caused by MRSA. Conclusions. A large body of anecdotal data, but only one randomized clinical trial, indicates the effectiveness of TMP-SMX as a treatment for MRSA infections. Double-blind, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the two available oral agents—TMP-SMX and linezolid—against MRSA. Author(s): Shellee A. Grim, Pharm.D. 1 | Robert P. Rapp, Pharm.D., FCCP 2 | Craig A. Martin, Pharm.D. 3 | Martin E. Evans, M.D. 4 1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Pharmacy Practice and Science Division, College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky. 3. Pharmacy Practice and Science Division, College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky., University of Kentucky, and University Hospital, Lexington, Kentucky. 4. Division of Infectious Diseases, College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky. 1.  | Increased hydrophobic interactions of iclaprim with Staphylococcus aureus dihydrofolate reductase are responsible for the increase in affinity and antibacterial activity. C. Oefner, M. Bandera, A. Haldimann, H. Laue, H. Schulz, S. Mukhija, S. Parisi, L. Weiss, S. Lociuro, G. E. Dale. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy | Volume: 63 | Issue: 4 | Pps: 687-698 CrossRef |
2.  | Strategies for managing today’s infections. Y. Carmeli. Clinical Microbiology and Infection | Volume: 14 | Issue: s3 | Pps: 22-31 CrossRef |
3.  | The evaluation and treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections. Paul B Cornia, Heather L Davidson, Benjamin A Lipsky. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy | Volume: 9 | Issue: 5 | Pps: 717-730 CrossRef |
4.  | Clinical Practice: Role of Folate Antagonists in the Treatment of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Richard A. Proctor. Clinical Infectious Diseases | Volume: 46 | Issue: 4 | Pps: 584 CrossRef |
5.  | Treatment approaches for community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Michael W Ellis, James S Lewis. Current Opinion in Internal Medicine | Volume: 5 | Issue: 1 | Pps: 7-12 CrossRef |
|