Pharmacotherapy Publishing Inc
View my basket
Atypon Link logo

You have no access to this article

Dispensing Error Rate in a Highly Automated Mail-Service Pharmacy Practice


Author(s): J. Russell Teagarden | Becky Nagle | Ronald E. Aubert | Calvin Wasdyke | Patrick Courtney | Robert S. Epstein
doi: 10.1592/phco.2005.25.11.1629
Prev | Table of contents | Next
 
View PDF article (65 K) View references
Email this link
 What is RSS?
Trouble viewing articles as PDF?
 
  Pharmacotherapy
 
Print ISSN: 0277-0008
Volume: 25 | Issue: 11
Cover date: November 2005
Page(s): 1629-1635
 
 
  Key Words
 
automated mail-service pharmacy, dispensing error, dispensing accuracy, medication error, prescription processing
 
  Abstract

Study Objective. To measure the rate of dispensing errors and to identify the types and sources of dispensing errors in a highly automated mail-service pharmacy practice.

Design. Descriptive analysis of a random sample of completed prescriptions.

Setting. A high-volume mail-service pharmacy practice comprising a network of prescription processing and dispensing pharmacies in the United States.

Measurements and Main Results. During September and October 2003, new and refill prescriptions were retrieved before shipping and evaluated for dispensing accuracy. Container contents were compared against the container label, and the label record was compared against the original prescription order. The overall dispensing error rate was 0.075% (16 dispensing errors among 21,252 prescriptions, 95% confidence interval 0.043–0.122). Fourteen errors involved incomplete or incorrect directions on the final label. All dispensing errors were associated with the initial stages of prescription processing (including order entry); no errors were associated with the mechanical stages of product dispensing.

Conclusion. A highly automated mail-service pharmacy can achieve a dispensing error rate of less than 1 error/1000 prescriptions, which is substantially lower than the rates reported for retail pharmacies. A high degree of automation in the mechanical aspects of dispensing appears to be a key factor in achieving this high dispensing accuracy.

 
  Author(s) affiliations
 
1. Department of Medical Affairs, Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Franklin Lakes and Willingboro, New Jersey.
Address reprint requests to J. Russell Teagarden, M.A., Department of Medical Affairs, Medco Health Solutions, Inc., 100 Parsons Pond Drive, F2-3, Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417; e-mail: russell_teagarden@medco.com.
2. Department of Professional Practice, Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Franklin Lakes and Willingboro, New Jersey.
3. Department of Medical Affairs, Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Franklin Lakes and Willingboro, New Jersey.
4. Department of Professional Practice, Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Franklin Lakes and Willingboro, New Jersey.
5. Department of Quality Assurance, Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Franklin Lakes and Willingboro, New Jersey.
6. Department of Medical Affairs, Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Franklin Lakes and Willingboro, New Jersey.
 
  This article has been cited by:
1.
 
Medication errors: the importance of safe dispensing.
Ka-Chun Cheung, Marcel L. Bouvy, Peter A. G. M. De Smet.
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology |  67 |  6 |  676-680
CrossRef
2.
 
Maximising generic utilisation: The power of pharmacy benefit management.
David B Snow.
Journal of Generic Medicines |  5 |  1 |  27
CrossRef