American Marketing Association
View my basket
Atypon Link logo

You have no access to this article

The Defensive Consumer: Advertising Deception, Defensive Processing, and Distrust


Author(s): Peter R Darke | Robin J.B Ritchie
doi: 10.1509/jmkr.44.1.114
Prev | Table of contents | Next
 
View PDF article (188 K) View PDF with links (200 K)
Email this link
 What is RSS?
Trouble viewing articles as PDF?
 
  Journal of Marketing Research
 
Print ISSN: 0022-2437  |  Electronic ISSN: 1547-7193
Volume: 44 | Issue: 1
Cover date: February 2007
Page(s): 114-127
 
 
  Keywords
 
false advertising, attitudes, suspicion, dual process theory, distrust
 
  Abstract

The authors show that deceptive advertising engenders distrust, which negatively affects people's responses to subsequent advertising from both the same source and second-party sources. This negative bias operates through a process of defensive stereotyping, in which the initial deception induces negative beliefs about advertising and marketing in general, thus undermining the credibility of further advertising.

 
  Author(s) affiliations
 
1Finning Ltd. Associate Professor of Marketing, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, and an assistant professor, Marketing Department, College of Business, Florida State University.
2Assistant Professor of Marketing, Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario.
 
  This article has been cited by:
1.
 
Auf den Rangplatz kommt es an – Wirkung der Rangfolge von Produkten auf das Entscheidungsverhalten.
Carina Leesch, Andreas Herrmann, Jan R. Landwehr.
Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft
CrossRef
2.
 
Relational Consequences of Perceived Deception in Online Shopping: The Moderating Roles of Type of Product, Consumer’s Attitude Toward the Internet and Consumer’s Demographics.
Sergio Román.
Journal of Business Ethics
CrossRef
3.
 
If It's Legal, Is It Acceptable?.
George R. Milne, Andrew Rohm, Shalini Bahl.
Journal of Advertising |  38 |  4 |  107-122
CrossRef
4.
 
Regulatory Exposure of Deceptive Marketing and Its Impact on Firm Value.
Martha Myslinski Tipton, , Sundar G. Bharadwaj, , Diana C. Robertson.
Journal of Marketing |  73 |  6 |  227-243
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (170 KB) | PDF Plus (189 KB) 
5.
 
Great expectations and broken promises: misleading claims, product failure, expectancy disconfirmation and consumer distrust.
Peter R. Darke, Laurence Ashworth, Kelley J. Main.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
CrossRef
6.
 
Justification Not by Faith Alone: Clergy Generating Trust and Certainty by Revealing Thought.
Paul A. Djupe, Brian R. Calfano.
Politics and Religion |  2 |  01 |  1
CrossRef
7.
 
Advertising corporate social responsibility initiatives to communicate corporate image: Inhibiting scepticism to enhance persuasion.
Alan Pomering, Lester W. Johnson.
Corporate Communications: An International Journal |  14 |  4 |  420-439
CrossRef
8.
 
Damage from Corrective Advertising: Causes and Cures.
Peter R. Darke, , Laurence Ashworth, , Robin J.B. Ritchie.
Journal of Marketing |  72 |  6 |  81-97
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (322 KB) | PDF Plus (337 KB) 
9.
 
Covert Marketing Unmasked: A Legal and Regulatory Guide for Practices That Mask Marketing Messages.
Ross D. Petty, , J. Craig Andrews.
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing |  27 |  1 |  7-18
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (90 KB) | PDF Plus 
10.
 
Commercializing Social Interaction: The Ethics of Stealth Marketing.
Kelly D. Martin, , N. Craig Smith.
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing |  27 |  1 |  45-56
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (143 KB) | PDF Plus (99 KB) 
11.
 
An Examination of the Effects of Activating Persuasion Knowledge on Consumer Response to Brands Engaging in Covert Marketing.
Mei-Ling Wei, , Eileen Fischer, , Kelley J. Main.
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing |  27 |  1 |  34-44
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (198 KB) | PDF Plus 
12.
 
Vigilant Against Manipulation: The Effect of Regulatory Focus on the Use of Persuasion Knowledge.
Amna Kirmani, Rui (Juliet) Zhu.
Journal of Marketing Research |  44 |  4 |  688-701
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (787 KB) | PDF Plus (235 KB) 
13.
 
Deliberative and Automatic Bases of Suspicion: Empirical Evidence of the Sinister Attribution Error.
Kelley J. Main, Darren W. Dahl, Peter R. Darke.
Journal of Consumer Psychology |  17 |  1 |  59
CrossRef