loss aversion , prospect theory, endowment effect, risk aversion In this article, the authors propose some psychological principles to describe the boundaries of loss aversion. A key idea is that exchange goods that are given up “as intended” do not exhibit loss aversion. For example, the authors propose that money given up in purchases is not generally subject to loss aversion. The results of several experiments provide preliminary support for the hypotheses. The authors find that, consistent with prospect theory, loss aversion provides a complete account of risk aversion for risks with equal probability to win or lose. The authors propose boundaries for this result and suggest further tests of the model. Author(s): Nathan Novemsky 1 | Daniel Kahneman 2 1. Assistant Professor of Marketing, School of Management, Yale University. 2. Eugene Higgins Professor of Psychology, Psychology Department, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University. 2.  | Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion. P. Sokol-Hessner, M. Hsu, N. G. Curley, M. R. Delgado, C. F. Camerer, E. A. Phelps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | Volume: 106 | Issue: 13 | Pps: 5035-5040 CrossRef |
3.  | Consumer decision making and variety of offerings: The effect of attribute alignability. Andreas Herrmann, Mark Heitmann, Robert Morgan, Stephan C. Henneberg, Jan Landwehr. Psychology and Marketing | Volume: 26 | Issue: 4 | Pps: 333-358 CrossRef |
4.  | Die Macht des Defaults — Wirkung von Empfehlungen und Vorgaben auf das individuelle Entscheidungsverhalten. Benjamin Polak, Andreas Herrmann, Mark Heitmann, Martin Einhorn. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft | Volume: 78 | Issue: 10 | Pps: 1033-1060 CrossRef |
5.  | Choosing Outcomes versus Choosing Products: Consumer‐Focused Retirement Investment Advice. Daniel G. Goldstein, Eric J. Johnson, William F. Sharpe. Journal of Consumer Research | Volume: 35 | Issue: 3 | Pps: 440-456 CrossRef |
6.  | Revised behavioural models for riskless consumer choice. J-J Huang. Journal of the Operational Research Society CrossRef |
7.  | An Incentive Compatible Conjoint Ranking Mechanism. Jayson L. Lusk, Deacue Fields, Walt Prevatt. American Journal of Agricultural Economics | Volume: 90 | Issue: 2 | Pps: 487-498 CrossRef |
8.  | Glenn W. Harrison, E. Elisabet Rutström. Risk Aversion in Experiments | Volume: 12 | Pps: 41 CrossRef |
11.  | When Gains Loom Larger Than Losses: Reversed Loss Aversion for Small Amounts of Money. Fieke Harinck, Eric Van Dijk, Ilja Van Beest, Paul Mersmann. Psychological Science | Volume: 18 | Issue: 12 | Pps: 1099 CrossRef |
15.  | Loss Aversion Is an Affective Forecasting Error. Deborah A. Kermer, Erin Driver-Linn, Timothy D. Wilson, Daniel T. Gilbert. Psychological Science | Volume: 17 | Issue: 8 | Pps: 649 CrossRef |
|