American Marketing Association
View my basket
Atypon Link logo

You have no access to this article

The Boundaries of Loss Aversion


Author(s): Nathan Novemsky | Daniel Kahneman
doi: 10.1509/jmkr.42.2.119.62292
Prev | Table of contents | Next
 
View PDF article (87 K) View PDF with links (91 K)
Email this link
 What is RSS?
Trouble viewing articles as PDF?
 
  Journal of Marketing Research
 
Print ISSN: 0022-2437  |  Electronic ISSN: 1547-7193
Volume: 42 | Issue: 2
Cover date: May 2005
Page(s): 119-128
 
 
  Keywords
 
loss aversion , prospect theory, endowment effect, risk aversion
 
  Abstract

In this article, the authors propose some psychological principles to describe the boundaries of loss aversion. A key idea is that exchange goods that are given up “as intended” do not exhibit loss aversion. For example, the authors propose that money given up in purchases is not generally subject to loss aversion. The results of several experiments provide preliminary support for the hypotheses. The authors find that, consistent with prospect theory, loss aversion provides a complete account of risk aversion for risks with equal probability to win or lose. The authors propose boundaries for this result and suggest further tests of the model.

 
  Author(s) affiliations
 
1. Assistant Professor of Marketing, School of Management, Yale University.
2. Eugene Higgins Professor of Psychology, Psychology Department, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University.
 
  This article has been cited by:
1.
 
Reference-Dependent Consumption Plans.
Botond Kőszegi, , Matthew Rabin.
American Economic Review |  99 |  3 |  909-936
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (262 KB) | PDF Plus (276 KB) 
2.
 
Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion.
P. Sokol-Hessner, M. Hsu, N. G. Curley, M. R. Delgado, C. F. Camerer, E. A. Phelps.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |  106 |  13 |  5035-5040
CrossRef
3.
 
Consumer decision making and variety of offerings: The effect of attribute alignability.
Andreas Herrmann, Mark Heitmann, Robert Morgan, Stephan C. Henneberg, Jan Landwehr.
Psychology and Marketing |  26 |  4 |  333-358
CrossRef
4.
 
Die Macht des Defaults — Wirkung von Empfehlungen und Vorgaben auf das individuelle Entscheidungsverhalten.
Benjamin Polak, Andreas Herrmann, Mark Heitmann, Martin Einhorn.
Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft |  78 |  10 |  1033-1060
CrossRef
5.
 
Choosing Outcomes versus Choosing Products: Consumer‐Focused Retirement Investment Advice.
Daniel G. Goldstein, Eric J. Johnson, William F. Sharpe.
Journal of Consumer Research |  35 |  3 |  440-456
CrossRef
6.
 
Revised behavioural models for riskless consumer choice.
J-J Huang.
Journal of the Operational Research Society
CrossRef
7.
 
An Incentive Compatible Conjoint Ranking Mechanism.
Jayson L. Lusk, Deacue Fields, Walt Prevatt.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics |  90 |  2 |  487-498
CrossRef
8.
 
Glenn W. Harrison, E. Elisabet Rutström.
Risk Aversion in Experiments |  12 |  41
CrossRef
9.
 
Reference-Dependent Risk Attitudes.
Botond Kőszegi, Matthew Rabin.
American Economic Review |  97 |  4 |  1047-1073
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (373 KB) | PDF Plus (385 KB) 
10.
 
Reservation Price as a Range: An Incentive-Compatible Measurement Approach.
Tuo Wang, R. Venkatesh, Rabikar Chatterjee.
Journal of Marketing Research |  44 |  2 |  200-213
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (289 KB) | PDF Plus (310 KB) 
11.
 
When Gains Loom Larger Than Losses: Reversed Loss Aversion for Small Amounts of Money.
Fieke Harinck, Eric Van Dijk, Ilja Van Beest, Paul Mersmann.
Psychological Science |  18 |  12 |  1099
CrossRef
12.
 
Modeling the Psychology of Consumer and Firm Behavior with Behavioral Economics.
Teck H. Ho, Noah Lim, Colin F. Camerer.
Journal of Marketing Research |  43 |  3 |  307-331
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (590 KB) | PDF Plus (616 KB) 
13.
 
New Books in Review.
Naveen Donthu, Meryl P. Gardner, Sandeep Krishnamurthy, Stephanie Noble, Nicholas H. Lurie.
Journal of Marketing Research |  43 |  2 |  303-306
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (46 KB) | PDF Plus (53 KB) 
14.
 
Discount Rates for Time Versus Dates: The Sensitivity of Discounting to Time-Interval Description.
Robyn A. LeBoeuf .
Journal of Marketing Research |  43 |  1 |  59-72
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (106 KB) | PDF Plus (114 KB) 
15.
 
Loss Aversion Is an Affective Forecasting Error.
Deborah A. Kermer, Erin Driver-Linn, Timothy D. Wilson, Daniel T. Gilbert.
Psychological Science |  17 |  8 |  649
CrossRef
16.
 
Three Cheers—Psychological, Theoretical, Empirical—for Loss Aversion.
Colin Camerer .
Journal of Marketing Research |  42 |  2 |  129-133
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (113 KB) | PDF Plus (116 KB) 
17.
 
How Do Intentions Affect Loss Aversion?.
Nathan Novemsky, , Daniel Kahneman .
Journal of Marketing Research |  42 |  2 |  139-140
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (35 KB) | PDF Plus (41 KB) 
18.
 
When Do Losses Loom Larger Than Gains?.
Dan Ariely, , Joel Huber, , Klaus Wertenbroch .
Journal of Marketing Research |  42 |  2 |  134-138
View Header/Abstract | View PDF article (52 KB) | PDF Plus (54 KB)