Australian Academic Press
View my basket
Atypon Link logo

You have free access to this article

Discordant Prenatal Phenotype and Karyotype of Monozygotic Twins Characterized by the Unequal Distribution of Two Cell Lines Investigated by Different Methods: A Review


Author(s): Barbara Gentilin | Silvana Guerneri | Vera Bianchi | Federica Natacci | Augusto Colombo | Roberto Fogliani | Renato Fortuna | Domenico A Coviello | Cristina Curcio | Faustina Lalatta
doi: 10.1375/twin.11.3.352
Prev | Table of contents | Next
 
View PDF article (149 K) View PDF with links (139 K)
Email this link
 What is RSS?
Trouble viewing articles as PDF?
 
  Twin Research and Human Genetics
 
Print ISSN: 1832-4274
Volume: 11 | Issue: 3
Cover date: June 2008
Page(s): 352-356
 
 
  Abstract

We present the case of a monozygotic twin pregnancy discordant for phenotype and karyotype. A chorionic villus sample was performed at the 11th week of gestation in a primigravida because of cystic hygroma detected by ultrasound in one twin of a monochorionic, biamniotic pregnancy. Rapid testing by means of quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction and conventional karyotyping, obtained by both short- and long-term culture, revealed a homogeneous monosomy X (45,X). Amniocentesis was performed separately for both twins before termination and showed an homogeneous monosomy X in one sample and a 46,X,del(X)(p11.1) karyotype in the other one. Postmortem fetal tissues culture confirmed the discordant karyotype between the two embryos. Placental samples obtained after termination revealed the cell line which was not detected at chorionic villus sampling. Based on this and previous reports, we suggest that in cases of a phenotypic discordance detected at ultrasound in the first trimester, it is advisable to perform a karyotype analysis on amniocytes because it better reflects fetal constitution rather than chorionic villi or lymphocytes in case of heterokaryotipic monosomy X monochorionic twins.

 
  Author(s) affiliations
 
1Clinical Genetic Unit, Dipartimento Salute della Donna, del Bambino e del Neonato, Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy.
2Medical Genetic Laboratory, Dipartimento dei Servizi, Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy.
3Clinical Genetic Unit, Dipartimento Salute della Donna, del Bambino e del Neonato, Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy.
4Clinical Genetic Unit, Dipartimento Salute della Donna, del Bambino e del Neonato, Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy.
5II^ Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Dipartimento Salute della Donna, del Bambino e del Neonato, Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy.
6II^ Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Dipartimento Salute della Donna, del Bambino e del Neonato, Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy.
7Medical Genetic Laboratory, Dipartimento dei Servizi, Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy.
8Medical Genetic Laboratory, Dipartimento dei Servizi, Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy.
9Medical Genetic Laboratory, Dipartimento dei Servizi, Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy.
10Clinical Genetic Unit, Dipartimento Salute della Donna, del Bambino e del Neonato, Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy.
*Address for correspondence: Dr Faustina Lalatta, Clinical Genetic Unit, Dipartimento Salute della Donna, del Bambino e del Neonato, Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Via Commenda 12, 20122 Milano, Italy.